Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Condon v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 14, 2000No. 25065PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

Appellant (the State) brought a lawsuit against respondent (City) in 1996, challenging a 1989 “strip” or “shoestring” annexation that led to the annexation of portions of Lexington County. A circuit judge granted City’s summary judgment motion and dismissed the case without addressing the legitimacy of the strip annexation. Thus, that issue is not before us. 1 The State appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

City purchased and annexed a strip of land about five feet wide and one mile long from Richtex Corporation in December 1989. The strip begins at the northern…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Alexander Oil Company v. City of SeguinTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc. v. Crane National Vendors Division of Unidynamics Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fennelly v. A-1 MacHine & Tool Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. Mountain Cement Co. v. South of Laramie Water & Sewer DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  3. City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
  4. City of North Myrtle Beach v. Lewis-DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. St. Andrews Public Service District v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API