State v. Sliger
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
We granted this appeal to determine whether our flagrant nonsupport felony statute applies to a nonresident who has never resided in Tennessee. The defendant, William J. Sliger, a Texas resident, was indicted by a Wilson County grand jury for the violation of the flagrant nonsupport statute, which provides that the offense is committed when a person leaves or remains without the state to avoid a legal duty of support. The trial court held that the State did not have jurisdiction and quashed the indictment. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the trial court,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- State v. PendergrassCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- State v. MixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Guy v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Hicks v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.