Legal Opinion

Treu v. Kirkwood

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1954No. Sac. 6282PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

From 1947 to 1949, Florenz Treu was a noneivil service employee in the office of the lieutenant governor. By writ of mandate, the state controller and the treasurer have been ordered to approve and pay her claim “for overtime worked . . . for which petitioner was not compensated and was not given compensating time off.” The appeal is from that judgment.

In her petition for a writ of mandate, Miss Treu alleged that, prior to the time the work was performed, the lieutenant governor had established normal office hours and promised her compensating time off for work beyond those hours. All…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Johndrow v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Martin v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ogo Associates v. City of TorranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. White v. Township of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Tirapelle v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Waller v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API