Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Etzler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1892No. 432PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

This was an action against the appellant to recover damages for the killing of one mule and the injuring *563of another, both the property of the appellee’s testator. The complaint was in two paragraphs, the first stating a cause of action under the statute, alleging that the mules went upon the railroad track at a point where the railroad might have been, but was not,securely fenced, etc., and the second seeking a recovery on the ground of negligence.

A demurrer to each paragraph of the complaint was overruled. The answer was a general denial. The cause was tried by the court, and a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Village of Grandville v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Strong v. MakeeverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Washington Ice Co. v. LayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SwartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Pitser v. McCreeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gillespie v. DulingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Small v. BinfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API