Legal Opinion

Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. Herbold

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1884No. 11,099PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Ejoliott, J. —

The appellee instituted this action to recover the value of a cow injured and a heifer killed by the locomotive and cars of the appellant. The action is founded upon the statute making it the duty of railroad companies to fence their roads, and imposing a liability for animals killed or injured because of the failure to perform this statutory duty.

Our decisions settle some general principles which apply to-this case, and which it is proper to declare at the outset constitute the law governing the case.

If animals enter upon the roadway at a place where it was the duty of the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. ShrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Wabash Railway Co. v. ForsheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Welty v. Indianapolis & Vincennes RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. ModesittIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HughesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. QuickIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API