Legal Opinion

Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. Kreiger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,275PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— This was a suit by the appellee to recover the value of two mare colts which wer^ run over and killed by the appellant’s locomotive, and where its road was not securely fenced. The cause was put at issue and tried by the court, and, at appellant’s request, the court found the facts specially, and stated its conclusion of law thereon, in substance, as follows:

“First. That the plaintiff was, in November, 1880, the-, owner of two colts, of the value of $120.
“Second. That, at said time, the defendant owned and operated a railroad in Porter county, Indiana, and through the lands of one Miller;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donellan v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Smith v. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Cox v. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bowen v. SwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Colchen v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Becknell v. BecknellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Laverty v. State ex rel. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API