Legal Opinion
Brant v. Bigler
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 1949No. Civ. 17011PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an adverse judgment in an action for declaratory relief wherein plaintiffs sought a declaration that defendant had defaulted under an agreement to purchase certain real estate from plaintiffs and that plaintiffs were entitled to recover and retain the sum of $1,000 paid by defendant and deposited in escrow pursuant to the agreement of sale. The judgment of the trial court was that plaintiffs take nothing and that the escrow holder return to defendant the $1,000 deposited by him.
On May 18, 1946, the parties entered into a written agreement for the sale of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Hawley v. KafitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Am-Cal Investment Co. v. Sharlyn Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Patty v. BerrymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Flagg v. Andrew Williams Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Antoinette Bornholdt v. Southern Pacific Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Weneda Corp. v. DispalatroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.