Antoinette Bornholdt v. Southern Pacific Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge.
This is a diversity action removed from the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, California to the Federal District Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 1 Jurisdiction of the appeal is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1294(1).
Plaintiffs, heirs of the original owners of certain real property in the Walnut Creek area of California, seek declaratory relief quieting title against defendant Southern Pacific Company to all or a portion of the property at issue. In the alternative, plaintiffs ask damages for an alleged inverse condemnation.
Uncontroverted evidence adduced at trial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Behlow v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Underhill v. Saratoga & Washington Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Ballard v. MacCallumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Idaho v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Thomas v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State of Idaho v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Crown Corporation, Debtor. Fred Doehring v. Crown CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Kelley v. City of LakewoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.