Legal Opinion
Patty v. Berryman
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1949No. Civ. 14145PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The administratrix of the estate of E. R. Berryman appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff, Walter W. Patty, $10,000 for breach of contract, and denying the estate’s right to any judgment against Patty and the other cross-defendant, John S. Huston.
The facts are as follows: On, prior, and after November 1, 1946, Huston was the owner of 22 prefabricated houses. On the morning of that day, Patty entered into a contract with Huston whereby Patty agreed to buy, and Huston impliedly agreed to sell, the 22 prefabricated houses for a total purchase price of $53,750, payable $1,000 on November 1st,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Hacker Pipe & Supply Co. v. Chapman Valve Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Davis v. JacobyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Foley v. EulessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Walpole v. Prefab Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Steiner v. ThextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Mark Fosson v. Palace (Waterland), LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.