Legal Opinion

Herman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff on March 16, *4861927, while waiting to board a street car on the reservation of the defendant, on Blue Hill Avenue, in the Mattapan district of Boston, based upon the alleged negligence of the defendant. The defendant rested at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, and on its motion a verdict was directed in its favor.

The plaintiff walked from his work to the corner of Fessenden Street and waited on the northeasterly corner of the sidewalk until the street car he desired to take came into view on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crowell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. LaBelle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Treen v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Fernald v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Herwitz v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Sears v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Pritchard v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Tobias v. BishopMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API