Fernald v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
It was uncontroverted that Huntington Avenue at the place where the plaintiff was injured was laid out by the street commissioners of the city of Boston under authority conferred by St. 1894, c. 324. The commissioners reserved between the side Unes of the layout a special portion or space for the location of a street railway, and the tracks of the defendant were lawfully laid and maintained within the limits of the reservation. It also was unquestioned that, while standing on the reservation where there was no cross walk nor any intersection or break in the sidelines, the nearest break or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Freeman v. United Fruit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Crowell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Treen v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- LaBelle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Herman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Sears v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Pritchard v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Tobias v. BishopMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1938