Legal Opinion

Treen v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 23, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

There was evidence tending to show that the plaintiff, while walking on the "reserved space” in Huntington Avenue in Boston, where there was neither a break nor cross walk, toward a white post with the purpose there to become a passenger of the defendant, was struck by one of the defendant’s cars and injured. When Huntington Avenue was laid out, this space was specially reserved under St. 1894, c. 324, for street railway track location. The case at bar is governed by Crowell v.- Boston Elevated Railway, 234 Mass. 393, where it was held that, under similar circumstances, the traveller was at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crowell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LaBelle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Fernald v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Herman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Sears v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Pritchard v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API