Legal Opinion

Sears v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 24, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for the death and ■ conscious suffering of the plaintiff’s intestate, resulting from an accident which occurred on September 28, 1937, when he was struck by one of the defendant’s cars as he was crossing Beacon Street, a public highway in Brookline. The answer was a general denial and an allegation of lack of due care of the intestate. The plaintiff waived counts for wanton and reckless conduct of the defendant. The jury returned verdicts for the plaintiff upon counts based upon the negligence of the defendant but the judge, under leave reserved, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Pittsley v. DavidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Campbell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Kelley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Rosenthal v. LissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Victum v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Beausoleil's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Norton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Becker v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API