Legal Opinion

Ambrose v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 28, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

These are two actions of tort to recover for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, her husband, which resulted from his having been struck by a street car of the defendant company while it was being operated by its *220servant, the defendant Stearns. At the close of the evidence each defendant filed a motion for a directed verdict. In each ease the judge denied the motion and the defendant duly excepted. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in each case. The exceptions of the defendants to the denials of the motions for directed verdicts bring the cases before us. The sole contention…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Mercier v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Hess v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Herman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Pritchard v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Institute for Economic Research v. Assessors of Great BarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Previews, Inc. v. EveretsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Herwitz v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Lucier v. NorcrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Norton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API