Legal Opinion
LaBelle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 3, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries received by the plaintiff, as a result of being struck by one of the defendant’s cars, at a point on Huntington *483Avenue within the limits of the reserved space as originally laid out under the provisions of St. 1894, c. 324. The first count of the declaration alleged that the plaintiff was injured by the negligence of the defendant while on its grounds as a passenger; the second, that he was upon Huntington Avenue, a public highway, when injured by negligence of the defendant; and the third, that the plaintiff was injured because of the careless…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Crowell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Doherty v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Poppel v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Treen v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Herman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Sears v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Pritchard v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Hirschberg v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1936
- Shaw v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.