Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. Womack

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1967No. 610PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Plaintiffs’ first assignment of error is that the court submitted insufficient and incorrect issues to the jury.

The number, form and phraseology of the issues lie within the sound discretion of the trial court, and the issues will not be held for error if they are sufficiently comprehensive to resolve all factual controversies and to enable the court to render judgment fully determining the cause. Conference v. Miles, 259 N.C. 1, 129 S.E. 2d 600; Rudd v. Stewart, 255 N.C. 90, 120 S.E. 2d 601; G.S. 1-200.

The only issue for decision in order to determine the rights of the parties in this cause…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kearney v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Wesley Ex Rel. Wesley v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Western Conference of Original Free Will Baptists v. MilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Morris v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Rudd Ex Rel. Rudd v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Murrow v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Wiseman v. WisemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Walker v. TOWN OF STONEVILLECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Trantham v. Michael L. Martin, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API