Legal Opinion

State v. Conard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1981No. 8129SC589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

The defendant first assigns as error the admission into evidence of statements made by defendant to Hazel Wiggins, a Polk County Magistrate. The defendant asked to speak with Mrs. Wiggins, whom defendant knew well because Mrs. Wiggins had worked with the defendant in the past as a juvenile officer. Mrs. Wiggins testified that the defendant told her that “you’ve always tried to help me and I want you to know the truth about the whole thing.” The defendant alleges that her statement to Mrs. Wiggins is not admissible because the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, 384…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. WestallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API