Legal Opinion

Allen v. Foreman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 1973No. 731SC333PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

- The only question is the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence to withstand defendants’ motion.

The parties made the following pertinent stipulation. The accident occurred at about 5:30 p.m., during daylight hours, on 18 June 1969 at a point approximately 1.9 miles east of Belcross in Camden County, a few feet west of the west end of a low bridge on U.S. Highway #158. At the location in question, U.S. Highway #158 has an asphalt surface with two lanes of *384travel which run generally in an east-west line. There are white lines painted at the north and south traveled edges of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Sink Ex Rel. Pullen v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Rountree v. . FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Brinson Ex Rel. Brinson v. MabrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Capps v. DillardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Allen v. ForemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API