Legal Opinion
Alston v. Monk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 15, 1988No. 8810SC229PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
373 S.E.2d 463 (1988)
92 N.C. App. 59
Frances I. ALSTON
v.
Ray MONK, Rovetta Allen, and Grady Perkins, d/b/a Raleigh Institute of Cosmetology.
No. 8810SC229.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
November 15, 1988.
Kirk, Gay, Kirk, Gwynn & Howell by Philip G. Kirk and Joseph T. Howell, Wendell, for plaintiff-appellee.
Yeargan, Thompson & Mitchiner by W. Hugh Thompson, Raleigh, for defendants-appellants.
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendants here present numerous assignments of error and argue they are entitled to a new trial. After a careful review of the record we disagree and affirm the trial court's judgment.
By…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Hall v. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Daughtry v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Severn Peanut Co., Inc. v. Industrial Fumigant Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Surratt v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Fortson v. McClellanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Oakes v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.