Legal Opinion
United States v. Dunbar
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided April 9, 1971No. 23,508PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FERGUSON, Judge:
The issue before us in this case— whether the plea of guilty to the charge of communicating a threat was provident — questions the application of this Court’s opinion in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247 (1969).
The specification of Additional Charge I, to which the accused pleaded guilty1 in a trial before a military judge alone, alleges that the accused “wrongfully communicate [d] to Sgt. R. M. Brown, U. S. Marine Corps, a threat by saying to him, ‘BROWN, I’ll kill you,’ or words to that effect.”
During the inquiry to determine the providence of the plea,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. ChancelorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. HolidayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. OuthierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. WartsbaughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. ZacharyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. McCrimmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. PineroCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.