Hines v. Miller
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County and from an order denying a new trial. G. W. Hicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SEARLS, C.
Two actions to foreclose mechanics’ liens upon the Pampa Hill Quartz mine, situated in the county of Tuolumne. The actions were consolidated, the cause tried by the court sitting without a jury, and written findings filed, upon which judgment of foreclosure was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. Defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Appellants interposed a demurrer to the complaint, upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This demurrer was properly overruled.
The precise objection…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gould v. WiseNevada Supreme Court · 1884
- Silvester v. Coe Quartz Mine Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Helm v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Moore v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Joyce v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Pacific Sash & Door Co. v. BumillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- S. H. Harmon Lumber Co. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Rio Grande Lumber & Fuel Co. v. BuergoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Ah Louis v. HarwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.