Legal Opinion

Pipkorn v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1987No. C4-87-123PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Howard Pipkorn brought this quiet title action to set aside the tax forfeiture sale of his lot to Evelyn Dunn. He alleges he was entitled to personal service of notice of the expiration of time for redemption under Minn.Stat. § 281.23, subd. 6 (1982). Pip-korn appeals from the judgment for Dunn. We reverse.

FACTS

In June, 1976, Pipkorn bought by contract for deed a lakeshore lot in the City of Arden Hills (“Lot A” or “the Lot”). He resides on the adjacent lot to the east. The lots border Lake Johanna on the south and a street on the north.

Although Pipkorn obtained a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cutting v. PattersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Wallace v. SacheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Nygren v. PatrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Weathers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Application of ThielkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harstad v. Mound Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Schleusner v. Murray CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API