Harstad v. Mound Investment Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*427OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a quiet title action, upholding a tax forfeiture sale of real estate where the prior owner never received notice of the expiration of its redemption period as required by Minn.Stat. § 281.14. The trial court ruled that Minn.Stat. § 284.28, subd. 1 validates any tax forfeiture sale, regardless of defects in the proceedings.
Before the court issued its ruling, third-party defendant State of Minnesota settled with appellant and respondent. Under the agreement, the state deposited $31,000 with the court. Both parties moved for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wallace v. SacheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- McHardy v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Nygren v. PatrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Application of ThielkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Pipkorn v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Safety Signs, LLC v. Niles-Wiese Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012