Legal Opinion

Harstad v. Mound Investment Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1987No. C4-87-1062PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*427OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a quiet title action, upholding a tax forfeiture sale of real estate where the prior owner never received notice of the expiration of its redemption period as required by Minn.Stat. § 281.14. The trial court ruled that Minn.Stat. § 284.28, subd. 1 validates any tax forfeiture sale, regardless of defects in the proceedings.

Before the court issued its ruling, third-party defendant State of Minnesota settled with appellant and respondent. Under the agreement, the state deposited $31,000 with the court. Both parties moved for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. SacheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. McHardy v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Nygren v. PatrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Application of ThielkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Pipkorn v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Safety Signs, LLC v. Niles-Wiese Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API