Wallace v. Sache
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to determine adverse claims to certain land. The case was tried before Hallam, J., who found that plaintiff was owner in fee simple of the premises described. Erom an order, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action, for the purpose of quieting her record title to the land described, against the defendant, who claimed title under tax proceedings. At the trial no attack ■ was made upon the tax judgment, the tax certificate, or the form of the notice affecting the expiration of the redemption. The trial court held that the notice of expiration was not served as the statute requires upon the person in actual possession of the land when the notice was issued and served. The language of the part of the statute here involved is: “If the person named in such notice cannot be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carey v. CagneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Churchill v. . OnderdonkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Green v. Cumberland Coal & Coke Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Newcome v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
- Cutting v. PattersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jurgensen v. AinscowNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- McHardy v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Burks v. HedingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- St. Paul Swimming Club v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Absetz v. McClellanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.