Legal Opinion

Nygren v. Patrin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1970No. 41921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action to quiet a tax title. Plaintiff, holder of the tax title, contends that defendants are barred from asserting any defense to the quiet-title action by virtue of the 1-year statutory limitation of Minn. St. 284.09. Plaintiff further contends that personal service of a notice of expiration of redemption, mandatory by Minn. St. 281.23, subd. 5, was not required when the evidence disclosed that the premises were not actually occupied on the date the sheriff attempted service.

From the record it appears that defendants, Floyd J. Patrin…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. DoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Fredericksen v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Montgomery & Mullen Lumber Co. v. QuimbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kelley v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. McHardy v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weathers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Pipkorn v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Harstad v. Mound Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Cobb v. City of WillmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API