Legal Opinion

Schleusner v. Murray County

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1987No. C1-87-1200PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

David Schleusner appeals from the trial court order affirming the weed eradication assessment against the land he rented. Appellant contends that the order was erroneous because Lake Sarah Township did not give him the notice prior to spraying required by Minn.Stat. § 18.271 (1984). We reverse.

FACTS

In 1981, appellant, jointly with Ralph No-votny, purchased farmland in Lake Sarah Township, Murray County. The land was held in the names of Novotny and appellant’s wife. The two men lived with their families in Hector, approximately 100 miles from the land. They farmed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cutting v. PattersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Wallace v. SacheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. McCauley v. Town of McCauleyvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Pipkorn v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Omdahl v. HadlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API