Legal Opinion

People v. Tate

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1946No. Crim. Ho. 495PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Defendant and appellant was charged in count I of an information with the crime of grand theft in that he did on May 7, 1945, “wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously take and steal from the person of one Robert Nealey certain personal property, to wit, lawful money of the United States of America,” in violation of sections 484 and 487 of the Penal Code. In counts II, III and IV, he is charged with prior convictions of felonies and the serving of prison terms thereunder. Defendant pleaded not guilty to count I and admitted the prior convictions as charged. After trial, a jury found him guilty on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. HennesseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. D'A PhilippoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. In Re RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tate v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. People v. TateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API