People v. Tate
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The defendant was charged with grand theft and with prior convictions. He admitted the prior convictions and a jury found him guilty on the main charge. He was adjudged an habitual criminal and sentenced to state prison for the term prescribed by law. He appealed and the judgment of conviction was affirmed. (People v. Tate, 72 Cal.App.2d 467 [164 P.2d 556].) Thereafter, he filed in the trial court a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. After a hearing, at which the defendant was present and represented by counsel,' the petition was denied. From the order denying said petition this appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. TateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Tate v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949