Legal Opinion

In Re Rogers

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1937No. Crim. 1553PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

By means of habeas corpus the petitioner seeks to obtain his discharge from Folsom state prison on the ground that he was wrongfully determined to be an habitual criminal and that he has served the maximum term which the law is authorized to impose for the offense of a felon having possession of a revolver capable of being concealed on his person contrary to the provisions of section 2 of an act regulating the possession, use, control or sale of firearms. (Stats. 1923, p. 695, and amendments, 1 Deering’s Gen. Laws of 1931, p. 900, Act 1970.)

The petitioner was convicted as a felon of having…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In Re RamerizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Doble v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In Re BoatwrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. People v. QuielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API