Legal Opinion

Tate v. People of the State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1951No. 12711_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant sought to file a petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. The court denied the right to file such a petition in forma pauperis. Since the record before does not show appellant made “affidavit that he is unable to pay such costs or give security therefor” as required by the statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915, it was proper to deny the right to file on this ground alone. The court held that the petition should be denied filing because no “exceptional circumstances of peculiar urgency,” required the issuance of the writ to free petitioner from custody on a conviction affirmed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Huffman v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. Ghiozzi v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Hess v. MerrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. TateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. TateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Nichols v. McGeeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
  3. Matter of Clifford Coleman Woods for a Certificate of Probable CauseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Meek v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  5. Smith v. Firestone Tire and Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API