Legal Opinion

Branch v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 13, 2011No. 08-498 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SMITH, Senior Judge:

This case arises out of an alleged violation of the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 209(d) (“EPA”), in which the Plaintiff, Mr. Branch, claims that he is receiving disparate pay on the basis of gender. While the evidence clearly shows that Mr. Branch was a very good and highly motivated employee, Ms. Navarro’s disparate pay grade was not the result of sex discrimination. While the agency engaged in a bit of bureaucratic disingen-uousness, aimed at giving Ms. Navarro tasks that would rationally justify her higher grade, they did not violate any statutes or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sheila Ann Glenn, Patricia F. Johns, and Robbie Nugent v. General Motors Corporation, Saginaw Steering Gear DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Yant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Moorehead v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Santiago v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Alston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
  5. Gibson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API