Legal Opinion
Santiago v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 8, 2012No. 10-695CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Senior Judge.
This suit arises under the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (2006) (“the Act”). Plaintiff, a civilian employee of the United States Amy, alleges a violation of the Act claiming that he was paid less than his female supervisor despite having performed substantially equal work for an eleven-month period during which the supervisor was largely absent from the office and for the following two-year period during which the supervisor position was vacant. Defendant has moved for partial dismissal of plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Thurza Strag v. Board of Trustees, Craven Community College Craven Community College, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Palafox Street Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Fraser v. Mta Long Island Rail Rd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- North v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.