Legal Opinion

Moorehead v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 18, 2008No. 07-654 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) (Def.’s Mot., docket entry 20), filed June 13, 2008, seeking judgment as a matter of law on Count I of plaintiff’s amended complaint (Am. Complaint, docket entry 4). On July 14, 2008, plaintiff filed a response in opposition to the motion (Pl.’s Resp., docket entry 21), to which defendant filed a reply on August 29, 2008 (Def.’s Reply, docket entry 32) along with defendant’s response to plaintiffs proposed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Moorehead v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Branch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API