Legal Opinion
Yant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 14, 2009No. 2009-5058PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge PROST.
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims granting the United States summary judgment that Plaintiffs do not qualify for coverage under the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1). Yant v. U.S., 85 Fed.Cl. 264 (2009). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The thirty-five plaintiffs (“the Yant plaintiffs”) are current and former nurse practitioners (“NPs”) employed by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) in the Tennessee Valley Healthcare…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Karen D. Peters, Cross-Appellants v. The City of Shreveport, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Crooker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.