Bertrand v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DESMOND, J.,
pro tern. — Plaintiff appeals from a judgment awarding her the sum of $963.05 and asks that the cause be remanded for a new trial upon the sole question of damages, claiming that “the court erred in finding that the sum of $963.05 was a reasonable sum to be allowed plaintiff for general and special damages, in that there is insufficient evidence to support said finding,” also that error arose when the court found an aggregate sum for damages and refused “to make separate findings on the various items of special damage which were specially pleaded and denied by the defendants and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Gustafson v. BlunkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Sessions v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Sturdevant v. SturdevantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Wilcox v. SwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Gastine v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Hicks v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.