Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Barnes

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1952No. Civ. 4361PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

This is an action for damages suffered by plaintiff when, while walking across North Chester Avenue in the city of Bakersfield, she was struck by an automobile operated by the defendant, Donald E. Barnes. The court, sitting without a jury, found for plaintiff and gave judgment in the sum of $2,000. Defendants appeal on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the court’s findings and judgment and that the court failed to make a finding on the issue of contributoiy negligence.

The accident occurred at the intersection of North Chester Avenue and McCord Street. North Chester…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Johndrow v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. James v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewetzow v. SapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Edgar v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. J. T. Jenkins Co. v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. McConnell v. ALL-COVERAGE INS. EXCH. AUTOMOBILE AND FIRECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Powers v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API