Sturdevant v. Sturdevant
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, J., pro tem.
By a statement of facts in ordinary and concise language, appellant in her complaint herein stated a cause of action for recovery from respondent of the sum of $2,986.86 on a subsisting and unsatisfied judgment entered in favor of appellant and against respondent by a Nebraska state court on July 1, 1925, for separate maintenance payable in monthly installments indefinitely. In his answer respondent admitted the making and entry of the judgment but denied that it was valid, subsisting and enforceable against him in Nebraska, as alleged in the complaint ; admits that he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Estate of PendellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stice v. SticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bertrand v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Cecchini v. RidingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955