Gustafson v. Blunk
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
Respondents are the wife and children of one David Gustafson, deceased. Deceased and an automobile operated by appellants collided as a result of which deceased was instantly killed.
The action was tried by the court sitting without a jury. Since judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs—respondents here—it is apparent that the trial court viewed the evidence as to how the collision occurred most favorably to the respondents. There is little conflict as to the salient features of the evidence. The record shows that the deceased, a man seventy-four years old, in normal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Linberg v. StantoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Tieman v. Red Top Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Butler v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Jessen v. Peterson, Nelson & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bechtold v. Bishop & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Gogo v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Avery v. Associated Seed Growers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Luce v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Babcock v. HoustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.