Legal Opinion

Pribek v. McGahan Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1934No. Appeal, 65PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

By their bill in equity in this case, plaintiffs seek to enjoin “defendants, their servants, agents and employees from obstructing, barricading, or in any manner interfering with plaintiffs’ use” of a four-foot right-of-way, and to require them [defendants] to restore the Way to the condition in which it was before they interfered with plaintiffs’ use of it. The final decree was that the bill should be dismissed and therefrom plaintiffs prosecute this appeal. The decree must be affirmed.

Plaintiffs claim the right of user of the four-foot way (1) By virtue of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kinter v. Commonwealth Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Young v. HippleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Riley v. Boynton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Dinger v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Dravo Contracting Co. v. James Rees & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Steel Abrasive Co. v. Louis J. Gedicke SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Ozehoski v. Scranton Spring Brook Water Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Margoline v. HolefelderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Pennsylvania Game Commission v. BowmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Owens v. HolzheidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API