Legal Opinion

Riley v. Boynton Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1931No. Appeal, 1PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This case involves the question of the effect of laches in barring actions in equity.

Illegal and fraudulent relations, so the bill avers, were entered into by the Boynton Coal Company and the Elk Lick Mining Company, a partnership, to the prejudice of the plaintiff, one of the four stockholders of the coal company, in 1918 and continued until 1920. The plaintiff had knowledge of this as early as June, 1918. In 1920 a committee of two of the directors of the coal company was appointed to consider plaintiff’s complaint. No action was taken in the matter by this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Landsdale v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Kinter v. Commonwealth Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Hardt v. HeidweyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Thorne's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Barnes & Tucker Co. v. Bird Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API