Legal Opinion

Owens v. Holzheid

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1984No. 00339PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This action was initiated when Appellees (the Holzheids) filed a Complaint In Equity. The Holzheids averred that they owned a right of way across Appellants’ (the Owens’) land. The Holzheids sought to have the Owens enjoined from interfering with this alleged right of way. The trial court recognized the Holzheids’ right-of-way and entered Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and a Decree Nisi, enjoining further interference by the Owens. The Owens timely filed exceptions, which were dismissed. The court, by Order, then made the Decree Nisi absolute.

The Owens raise two issues…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burns Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. BoehmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Percy A. Brown & Co. v. RaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Finley v. Glenn Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Piper v. MowrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Lauderbach-Zerby Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Louis W. Epstein Family Partnership Levitz Furniture Corporation, Intervenor in D.C. v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Possessky v. DiemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Mann-Hoff v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Porter v. KalasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Southall v. HumbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API