Ozehoski v. Scranton Spring Brook Water Service Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
In this action in ejectment, defendant disclaimed title to plaintiffs’ land but asserted an easement of a way, with the right to maintain pipe lines under it, described by plaintiffs in their praecipe and declaration as “a strip of land twelve (12) inches in width, four feet beneath the top of the soil, and seventy-three (73) feet in length running through lot No. 2315 of plot of lots known as the Honey Pot plot, as laid out by the Susquehanna Collieries Company ......” The case was tried by a judge without a jury. Judgment was entered for defendant for the easement in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peck v. ConwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Finley v. Glenn Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Lauderbach-Zerby Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Hammond v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Goldberg v. NicolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Taylor v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Brady v. YodanzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Garan v. Bender Et VirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Pennsylvania Game Commission v. BowmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Paci v. ShipleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.