Dinger v. Friedman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,
B. D. Dinger served Henry Friedman and Henry Flaster in a suit to recover for work done under two written contracts made between him and one Joseph Arnold; he obtained a verdict on which judgment was entered, and defendants have appealed.
The first writing in suit states that “B. D. Dinger ......agrees to drill three [oil or gas] wells for Joseph Arnold on the locations and at the places decided upon by the said Joseph Arnold,” for a stipulated consideration. The second writing refers to the first and mentions Arnold as “doing business” under the name of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- McConville v. InghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Edmundson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Dillon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Dickson v. McGraw Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- General Equipment Manufacturers v. Westfield InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Comstock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Greenfield v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.