Margoline v. Holefelder
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen,
Plaintiff is the owner of record, since 1936, of a lot which is improved with various structures. Immediately adjacent to plaintiff’s property is defendants’ lot which is also improved. Vehicular traffic over defendants’ lot created a driveway running to plaintiff’s property. The driveway was used, among other things, for ingress and egress by plaintiff, his family, his tenants, and servicemen.
Previous to plaintiff’s use,- Ms predecessors in title used the driveway. Defendants sought' to introduce testimony, that plaintiff’s predecessors in title utilized the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wampler v. ShenkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Demuth v. AmwegSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Pribek v. McGahan Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Haefele v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Fidler v. RehmeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Keefer v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Reed v. WolyniecSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Waltimyer v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Sterner v. FreedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Orth v. WerkheiserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.