Legal Opinion

Margoline v. Holefelder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1966No. Appeal, 75PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

Plaintiff is the owner of record, since 1936, of a lot which is improved with various structures. Immediately adjacent to plaintiff’s property is defendants’ lot which is also improved. Vehicular traffic over defendants’ lot created a driveway running to plaintiff’s property. The driveway was used, among other things, for ingress and egress by plaintiff, his family, his tenants, and servicemen.

Previous to plaintiff’s use,- Ms predecessors in title used the driveway. Defendants sought' to introduce testimony, that plaintiff’s predecessors in title utilized the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wampler v. ShenkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Demuth v. AmwegSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Pribek v. McGahan Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Haefele v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Fidler v. RehmeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keefer v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Reed v. WolyniecSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Waltimyer v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Sterner v. FreedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Orth v. WerkheiserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API