Legal Opinion
Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 2007No. C-060772PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cunningham, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) appeals the judgment of the trial court entered on a jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiffappellee Robert Meyer on his claims for age discrimination under R.C. 4112.99 and for retaliatory discharge under R.C. 4123.90 for filing workers’ compensation claims. Meyer brought these claims after UPS discharged him after 24 years of employment as a delivery driver. Meyer was then 45 years old. In his final year of employment, Meyer had sustained several serious job-related injuries for which he had filed claims for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Eysoldt v. ProScan ImagingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Mortensen v. Intercontinental Chemical Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- DeLong v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009