Legal Opinion

Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2009No. 2008-0315Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Meyer v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 104,

2009-Ohio-2463.] MEYER, APPELLEE, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., APPELLANT. [Cite as Meyer v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 104,

2009-Ohio-2463.] Employment discrimination—Age-discrimination claim under R.C. 4112.99— Applicability of R.C. 4112.02 and 4112.14. (No. 2008-0315 — Submitted February 3, 2009 — Decided June 2, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-060772, 174 Ohio App.3d 339,

2007-Ohio-7063. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT 1. An age-discrimination claim brought pursuant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API