Benjamin Phillips and Paul S. Starcher v. Arthur W. Carlson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the-Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to the senior party, Carlson, of the single count involved in this appeal.
A patent, U.S.Patent No. 2,739,161, issued on March 20, 1956 to Carlson, the senior party, on an application filed December 16, 1954, containing a single claim, the count of this interference. It reads:
As a new composition of matter a compound of the structure
That compound has been referred to by the parties variously as bis- and di(2, 3 epoxycyclopentyl) ether and as bis- and di-(2, 3 epoxycyclopentenyl)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thurston v. WulffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Potter v. ToneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- James A. Patterson and Glenn K. Lissner v. Karl-Heinz HauckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. KassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Mikus v. WachtelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.