Legal Opinion

Reed v. Cislak

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 28, 1949No. 5604PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from a decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office, awarding priority of invention of the subject matter defined in four counts to appellees.

The interference involves an - application of appellant, serial No. 510,376, filed November 15,1943, and an application of appellees, serial No. 436,168, filed March 25, 1942. Appellant, being the junior party, has the burden of proving priority of invention by a preponderance of the evidence.

Both parties took testimony, filed briefs, and were represented at the final…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. OlsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. Kear v. RoderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  3. Patterson v. ClementsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kenneth L. Berry v. Watt W. Webb, William A. Wissler and William D. ForgengCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz v. Charles Newton Kimberlin, Jr. And Elroy Merle GladrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API