Legal Opinion

Deboer v. Fattor

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1956No. 3930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*317OPINION

By the Court, Badt, J.:

This appeal presents for our determination the question whether plaintiff’s action was commenced within the statutory two-year limitation on an action for damages caused by the defendant’s wrongful act. Section 8524, N.C.L.1929, as amended, Stats. 1951, 247. In 1944 this court, construing sec. 8573, N.C.L., providing that civil actions are commenced “by the filing of a complaint with the clerk of the court, and the issuance of a summons thereon”, concluded “that the word ‘issuance’ * * * means not only the act of signing the summons and the placing of the seal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schrœder v. Merchants & Mechanics' InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Yudin v. CarrollDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1944
  3. Nevada Cornell Silver Mines, Inc. v. HankinsNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Woodstock v. WhitakerNevada Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ward v. Saben Appliance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Weaver v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Stevens v. SaundersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Heiser v. Association of Apartment Owners of Polo Beach ClubDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1993
  5. Deboer v. FattorNevada Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API