Legal Opinion

Schrœder v. Merchants & Mechanics' Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1882PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John G-. Rogers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

Appellant sued appellee in assumpsit, to recover for loss by fire on a policy of insurance. The policy contained a clause that no suit or action against the company to recover for loss thereunder shall be sustained, “unless such suit or action shall be commenced within twelve months next after the loss shall occur; ” and if it should be commenced after that time, “the lapse of time shall be taken as conclusive evidence against the validity of the claim, any statute of limitations to the contrary notwithstanding. ” Before the expiration of twelve months after loss plaintiff sued out a summons…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bush v. HansonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Burnap v. WightIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Melson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Fish v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Eylenfeldt v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Milwaukee Mechanics' Insurance v. SchallmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Howard v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API